Diplomacy By Deception by Dr. John Coleman

When you have read "Diplomacy By Deception" you will have little doubt that the British and United States Governments are the most corrupt in the world and that without their full cooperation in carrying out the designs of the Committee of 300, this supranational body would not be able to go forward with its plans for a One World Government, to which former President Bush, one of its more able servants, referred to as "the New World Order."

It is my earnest wish that "Diplomacy By Deception" will bring about a greater understanding of how secret societies operate, and how their orders are carried out by the very people who are supposed to serve the national interests and guard the national security of their respective countries and their people.

Your browser does not support the video tag.

Dr. John Coleman

1 - The Threat of the United Nations.

The history of how the United Nations was created is a classic case of diplomacy by deception. The United Nations is the successor to the defunct League of Nations, the first attempt to set up a One World Government in the wake of the Paris Peace Conference which gave birth to the Treaty of Versailles.

The peace conference opened at Versailles, France on January 18, 1919, attended by 70 delegates representing the international bankers from the 27 "victorious" allied powers. It is a fact that delegates were under the direction of the international bankers from the time they were selected as delegates until they returned to their own countries, and even long after that.

Let us be perfectly clear, the peace conference was about bleeding Germany to death; it was about securing huge sums of money for the international brigand-bankers who had already reaped obscene re wards alongside the terrible casualties of the five-year war (1914 1919). Britain alone suffered 1,000,000 deaths and more than 2,000,000 wounded. It is estimated by war historian Alan Brugar, that the international bankers made a profit of $10,000 from every soldier who fell in battle. Life is cheap when it comes to the Committee of 300-Iluminati-Rothschilds-Warburg-Federal Reserve bankers, who financed both sides of the war.

Disgruntled, or Thieves?

When America was besieged with race riots in the 60's, the Negroes looted all of the shops. During the riots in 1980's Britain, the Negroes looted all of the shops. When Rodney King was beaten, the Negroes looted all of the shops. When Hurricane Katrina hit the city of New Orleans, the Negroes looted all of the shops. Now during these latest London riots, the Negroes looted all of the shops!

Dunning: Its Parochial History, with notes, Antiquarian, Ecclesiastical, Baronial, and Miscellaneous, by John Wilson

By JOHN WILSON, D.D., MINISTER at DUNNING, 1861 - 1878.

Extended by W Wilson, M.A., Minister at Trossachs.

CRIEFF: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY D. PHILIPS, STRATHEARN HERALD OFFICE. 1906


PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION.

THIS historical sketch of the parish of Dunning was compiled by the Rev. John Wilson, D.D., and published in connection with the introduction of water into the village in 1872, as a contribution to a bazaar held to raise funds for that purpose. The edition issued was very soon exhausted, but the book continued to be asked for, and it is thought probable that a re-issue will now be acceptable to many who are interested in Dunning. The main features of the book remain the same, but after a lapse of more than 30 years, new events and some comparisons with former periods invited bringing up to present date, which has been done. Some additional historical information, by the kind consent of the Rev. P. Thomson, D.D., the present minister, has been incorporated from his interesting chapter on Dunning in “Chronicles of Strathearn” (D. Philips, Crieff, 1896). Also by the courtesy of the late Rev. Robert Small, D.D., much of the information concerning the Nonconforming Churches in Dunning is borrowed from his “History of the Congregations of the United Presbyterian Church.” The present Editor must be held responsible for considerable extension, and, for some conjectures in the section on the Architecture of the Church. Other various additions and alterations do not seem to call for special mention.

 W. W.

MANSE OF TROSSACHS, 1906.

Dwie prawice: skrajna i fałszywa

[This Polish translation of our article was found at Patriotyczny Ruch Polski]

16 Sierpień 2011

 

The Right Far and Faux - http://christogenea.org/articles/anders-breivik-right-far-and-faux

William Finck – 11.08.2011 tłumaczenie Ola Gordon

 

 Są dwie prawice: skrajna i fałszywa. Prawdziwi biali nacjonaliści nie zabijają białych współbraci, nawet kiedy się z nimi nie zgadzają w kwestiach politycznych czy religijnych. Jest tak dlatego, że prawdziwi nacjonaliści są nacjonalistami, gdyż ponad wszystko kochają swoich współbraci, i ta miłość sprawiła, że stali się nacjonalistami. Prawdziwa skrajna prawica jest nacjonalistyczna. Prawdziwe chrześcijaństwo wymaga, by chrześcijanie kochali współbraci na drugim miejscu po Bogu.

Éviter la confusion à propos de la femme cananéenne

Éviter la confusion à propos de la femme cananéenne

par William Finck

Il semble qu’il existe depuis longtemps un certain degré de confusion concernant la guérison de la fille d’une femme cananéenne par Yahshua Christ, un incident décrit en Matt. 15:21--28 et Marc 7:24--30, une confusion présente spécialement parmi les adhérents de l’Identité Chrétienne. Bien que les descriptions de cet évènement soient souvent perverties par les promoteurs de l’universalisme, en réalité ces évènements réfutent l’universalisme. Pourtant, ceux qui comprennent l’Ancien Testament et les malédictions contre les Cananéens ne peuvent que se demander comment et pourquoi Yahshua Christ a montré de la miséricorde envers cette femme particulière, et ce sujet a été la cause de bien des débats. Ce court essai essayera de dissiper toute confusion entourant cet épisode.

Premièrement, il faut noter que les récits de cet évènement, provenant de Matthieu et de Marc, diffèrent de façon significative. Il faut bien comprendre qu’aucun témoignage des évangiles ne peut être regardé comme étant par lui-même complet et final sur un évènement particulier ; chaque rédacteur a témoigné, ou a enregistré des témoignages, de tout ou partie d’un évènement vu d’une certaine perspective, et a décrit des parties de cet évènement considérés comme notables et tels qu’ils furent mémorisés. Rassembler les diverses parties de cet épisode particulier permet donc d’avoir une vision des choses plus complète.