Conspiratorial History

PART 1 - THROUGH THE 19TH CENTURY  -  History Of The Money Changers - Hitchcock

HISTORY OF THE MONEY CHANGERS

By Andrew Hitchcock

February 26, 2006

Economists continually try and sell the public the idea that recessions or depressions are a natural part of what they call the “business cycle”.

This timeline below will prove that is simply not the case.  Recessions and depressions only occur because the Central Bankers manipulate the money supply, to ensure more and more is in their hands and less and less is in the hands of the people.

Central Bankers developed out of money changers and it is with these people we pick the story up in 48 B.C. below.

Behold the International Jew!

By Brig. Gen. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, CPDL

". . . without regard for race, colour, creed, age, sex or national origin"

(Knowledgeable men, Jew and Gentile, speak out regarding the International Zionist Conspiracy) 

Introduction

In dealing with any controversial subject such as International Judaism and its Satanic offspring Zionism and Communism, it is often difficult to get a message of warning across to those who are in the most immediate danger. This is due to the fact that the Christian world has become so "brainwashed" in the "Liberal mind detergent" of Zionist propaganda, that immediately, when one speaks of a Jew in any but the most complimentary of terms, he is saddled with the horrible accusation of being an "anti-Semite." This has stifled honest discussion of this tremendous problem.  

By Arnold Leese, 1945

Preface

I stood, as Mr. Richard Stokes, M. P., stood, for a negotiated peace, but, possibly, on vastly different grounds. Mr. Stokes was not interned, because he will not face the Jewish Menace. Since the beginning of the War, I did what little I could in favour of a negotiated peace, no matter which side was for the moment on top. I believe that the War was, from the National standpoint, a disaster — wrong and unnecessary. For holding similarviews on other wars contemporary to them, such well-known men as: Pitt, Fox, Bright, Lloyd George, Ramsay MacDonald and the present Home Secretary Herbert Morrison were not interned. There is of course a difference in my case, as I am attacking the Jews and they were not, and the Jew holds supreme power.

I have attacked the Jews before and won a great moral victory over them. The Jews had me imprisoned for six months in 1936 for what was said to be a "public mischief" in that I mentioned in my paper, "The Fascist," the subject of Jewish Ritual Murder. Evidently judging me by their own standards, they thought to frighten me into silence. When I came out of prison I published a book on the subject, and they honoured me by maintaining a silence so intense that it could almost be heard! They were afraid to advertise it by taking another action against me. I defied them successfully and the book has since been distributed all over the world. I hope therefore to do it successfully again.

"The 'World' in a Quote"

We recovered an old pamphlet which, by internal evidence, appears to have been compiled in or around 1992 (the last dated citation bears the date October 11, 1992).  It was put together by a Mr. Jeffrey L. Ostler (whom we do not know).  In this pamphlet he has painstakingly searched out quotes and excerpts that illustrate the fall of the Christian society, et all.

The "Editor notes" are his, we left them intact they are rendered as "(- Ed.)”.  Any notes made by us at Watchmen Bible Study Group are in "[brackets]".  While we proofread the document, it is possible that some typos exist due to scanning-error.

Also, the chapter titles and divisions are ours; we rearranged the order in which the author presented the quotes.  We did this for the ease of reader's searches.  We felt that the quotes, aligned into categories of subject, would be more beneficial to the investigator.

And while we can appreciate the sheer labour involved in gathering all these quotations; especially before home computers and search engines were at the level that they are today; we must take issue with the Author, in that he seems to have systematically omitted and clouded all references to the Jews - but every quote that he supplies is the direct result of the International Jewish program to deconstruct God's world.  They do this for their god antichrist (Satan).   

Gentile  Folly: the Rothschilds

by ARNOLD LEESE

Author of “My Irrelevant Defence: Jewish Ritual Murder.”

This book is dedicated, with permission, to H. H. BEAMISH, the pioneer, who set my feet upon the way.

“If I am killing a rat with a stick and have him in a corner,

I am not indignant if he tries to bite me and squeals and

gibbers with rage. My job is, not to get angry, but to keep

cool, to attend to my footwork and to keep on hitting him

where it will do the most good.”—

A. S. Leese, speaking at Reception, 17th Feb., 1937, on his return from prison where he was consigned for writing the truth about Jews.

We do not agree with everything here, but it has some good points, and we hope to write on this topic one day soon. But who wrote this article? If you know, please email us and let us know!

Throughout the centuries, leading Jewish mystics and Kabbalists regarded Plato as astudent of their doctrines. Among the prominent Kabbalists of the Renaissance, forexample, was Leone Ebreo, who saw Plato as dependent on the revelation of Moses, and even as a disciple of the ancient Kabbalists. While Rabbi Yehudah Messer Leon, criticized the Kabbalah's similarity to Platonism, his son described Plato as a divine master. Other Kabbalists, such as Isaac Abravanel and Rabbi Yohanan Alemanno, believed Plato to have been a disciple of Jeremiah in Egypt. On the similarity of the teachings of the Greek philosophers and the Kabbalah, Rabbi Abraham Yagel commented:

THE ERA OF WORLD RUIN!

(The Era of Democracy)

By ARNOLD LEESE 

The claim of the Jews that they installed Democracy for the express purpose of ruining the Gentile world.

THE words, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity which are sometimes summed up in the word “Liberalism” have a noble sound and appearance. Are they not above criticism? Yes, but only when each one is in its right place: Liberty where Liberty can be exercised with intelligence, Equality where Equality really exists, and so on. And yet, in the domain of politics these words are, as will be shown in the course of this Note, anathema to anyone acquainted with their origin and with the evil purpose to which they have been applied, and with the results of their use.

The main result of their use has been the splitting up of coun­tries into warring political parties. These parties are known collectively as Democracy. When Democracy holds an election, it is supposed to produce—at least we flatter ourselves that it produces—a Parliament which represents the best interests of the State. But as the majority of members are forced by their political Association to put the interests of party before that of the State, Democracy fails at the very outset to achieve its main object. So it just carries on in a disjointed manner, in a state of political warfare with itself.

PREFACE

1912 - P.S. King & Son - Orchard House Westminister

A CAREFUL watch on the events of a quarter of a century has convinced me that the vicious social developments of the nineteenth century were abnormal and were due to an artificial, and therefore removable, cause.  That the cause is deep, insidious and subtle goes without saying:  had it been obvious it would have been easily discovered.

Nowhere have I seen a full text of Magna Charta, which so illuminates the times of the Normans, save in a translation of a French History of England;  the book came from Beckford’s library and was in a fisherman’s cottage.  It is curious that in a translation of a Dutch work have I discovered the best historical account of the Bank of England.  I refer to Bisschop’s Rise of the London Money Market.  But for that work I must have apologized for the slenderness of the early history in this book.  Bisschop’s work makes an apology unnecessary;  it is needless to multiply labour:  where he leaves off the argument of this book commences.

WHAT THOSE "IN THE KNOW" SAY

·